<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco pulls out of WiMAX market, almost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telecoms.com/18730/cisco-pulls-out-of-wimax-market-almost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telecoms.com/18730/cisco-pulls-out-of-wimax-market-almost/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cisco-pulls-out-of-wimax-market-almost</link>
	<description>telecoms.com is the leading provider of global news, comment and analysis for the telecommunications industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/18730/cisco-pulls-out-of-wimax-market-almost/comment-page-1/#comment-7968</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=18730#comment-7968</guid>
		<description>Several ISP&#039;s in africa including us, invested in Navini Wimax solutions prior to it being bought by Cisco. With Cisco, upgrading our bts to wimax 16e, profile B and then C  has proven to be a most expensive experience, and for us as well as several ISP&#039;s prohibitive. With Cisco&#039;s announcement, i am really sorry for those African ISP&#039;s that migrated.   Once again we are left holding the &quot;empty can&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several ISP&#8217;s in africa including us, invested in Navini Wimax solutions prior to it being bought by Cisco. With Cisco, upgrading our bts to wimax 16e, profile B and then C  has proven to be a most expensive experience, and for us as well as several ISP&#8217;s prohibitive. With Cisco&#8217;s announcement, i am really sorry for those African ISP&#8217;s that migrated.   Once again we are left holding the &#8220;empty can&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/18730/cisco-pulls-out-of-wimax-market-almost/comment-page-1/#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=18730#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>&quot;But Navini might be just as at home in Cisco’s edge technology portfolio where it extends the company’s wifi and wifi mesh portfolios to include WiMAX.&quot;

What does this mean? Engineering personnel have reassigned ... is this what that means?

Also note: No one yet has an 8-element beamforming apparatus for the 2.5/3.5 GHz bands; not Moto, not Huawei, not anybody ... &#039;cept the BWX 8300 series family by Cisco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But Navini might be just as at home in Cisco’s edge technology portfolio where it extends the company’s wifi and wifi mesh portfolios to include WiMAX.&#8221;</p>
<p>What does this mean? Engineering personnel have reassigned &#8230; is this what that means?</p>
<p>Also note: No one yet has an 8-element beamforming apparatus for the 2.5/3.5 GHz bands; not Moto, not Huawei, not anybody &#8230; &#8216;cept the BWX 8300 series family by Cisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

