<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What took so long? Common handset charger on its way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way</link>
	<description>telecoms.com is the leading provider of global news, comment and analysis for the telecommunications industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/comment-page-1/#comment-3672</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=12443#comment-3672</guid>
		<description>Interesting, indeed good news. However, last time I checked Qualcomm didn&#039;t make handsets. Is there anything they don&#039;t poke their noses into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, indeed good news. However, last time I checked Qualcomm didn&#8217;t make handsets. Is there anything they don&#8217;t poke their noses into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAT</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/comment-page-1/#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>CAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=12443#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>Well, at least they signed it, but I am very curious to see the first iPhone compatible with other devices, not just chargers. Guess it&#039;ll be 4.0 or beyond ?;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least they signed it, but I am very curious to see the first iPhone compatible with other devices, not just chargers. Guess it&#8217;ll be 4.0 or beyond ?;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAT</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/comment-page-1/#comment-3663</link>
		<dc:creator>CAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=12443#comment-3663</guid>
		<description>How about Apple?
Are the EU and main standard bodies going to put pressure on them, too?

So far even the Bluetooth standard is ignored and &quot;spat on&quot; by Apple, as e.g. a Bluetooth headset working perfectly fine with every major vendor (Moto, Sony, Nokia or Palm) won&#039;t work with the iPhone as long as Apple is not its vendor. This is sick and hostile to both customers and the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Apple?<br />
Are the EU and main standard bodies going to put pressure on them, too?</p>
<p>So far even the Bluetooth standard is ignored and &#8220;spat on&#8221; by Apple, as e.g. a Bluetooth headset working perfectly fine with every major vendor (Moto, Sony, Nokia or Palm) won&#8217;t work with the iPhone as long as Apple is not its vendor. This is sick and hostile to both customers and the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

