<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What took so long? Common handset charger on its way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way</link>
	<description>telecoms.com is the leading provider of global news, comment and analysis for the telecommunications industry</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/comment-page-1#comment-3672</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=12443#comment-3672</guid>
		<description>Interesting, indeed good news. However, last time I checked Qualcomm didn't make handsets. Is there anything they don't poke their noses into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, indeed good news. However, last time I checked Qualcomm didn&#8217;t make handsets. Is there anything they don&#8217;t poke their noses into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAT</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/comment-page-1#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>CAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=12443#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>Well, at least they signed it, but I am very curious to see the first iPhone compatible with other devices, not just chargers. Guess it'll be 4.0 or beyond ?;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least they signed it, but I am very curious to see the first iPhone compatible with other devices, not just chargers. Guess it&#8217;ll be 4.0 or beyond ?;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAT</title>
		<link>http://www.telecoms.com/12443/what-took-so-long-common-handset-charger-on-its-way/comment-page-1#comment-3663</link>
		<dc:creator>CAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telecoms.com/?p=12443#comment-3663</guid>
		<description>How about Apple?
Are the EU and main standard bodies going to put pressure on them, too?

So far even the Bluetooth standard is ignored and "spat on" by Apple, as e.g. a Bluetooth headset working perfectly fine with every major vendor (Moto, Sony, Nokia or Palm) won't work with the iPhone as long as Apple is not its vendor. This is sick and hostile to both customers and the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Apple?<br />
Are the EU and main standard bodies going to put pressure on them, too?</p>
<p>So far even the Bluetooth standard is ignored and &#8220;spat on&#8221; by Apple, as e.g. a Bluetooth headset working perfectly fine with every major vendor (Moto, Sony, Nokia or Palm) won&#8217;t work with the iPhone as long as Apple is not its vendor. This is sick and hostile to both customers and the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
